Comments on: Moving beyond Education 2.0

By: INTERVIEW MET JOHN MORAVEC | Aad van der Drift

INTERVIEW MET JOHN MORAVEC | Aad van der Drift — Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:45:19 +0000

[...] een kenniseconomie als medewerker en ondernemer(volledig spectrum van John Moravec is te vinden op http://www.educationfutures.com/2008/02/15/moving-beyond-education-20/ [...]

By: Kristen Nicole

Kristen Nicole — Thu, 16 Sep 2010 03:25:25 +0000

I want to share some of my experiences with education 3.0. I am a college student, and last year I decided that I wanted to research educational technology in the Tibetan community in India. I began a research blog at the encouragement of my professor, and I began to contact people in India. I have one Tibetan following my blog, several Tibetan Facebook friends, a few email contacts, and I’ve Skyped with two Tibetans. Some of my contacts are employees in the schools I hope to use as centers for my research. I do not yet know what will be the focus of my research, and I’m not going until next summer, but I have some wonderful resources who know me and have expressed their willingness to help me.

How’s that for education 3.0?

By: WEB 3.0 The Future of Education « 21st Century Education

WEB 3.0 The Future of Education « 21st Century Education — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:12:41 +0000

[...] a little background on this new paradigm of human capital development, you may wish to start with this chart on Education 3.0, or view this presentation on [...]

By: Àngel E. Rúa

Àngel E. Rúa — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:39:39 +0000

Very interesting and a really cool vision about education.

I’m not very sure if some aspects (in example “hardware and software in schools”) will be as you have exposed.

Some other things -and in my opinion important- are ignored: content production, treatment of learning subjects and license of contents. If you are right the general vision of subjects in education must change. I have seen little changes in treatment of subjects at schools and universities. And what will be the future of content licenses? If we pay attention to the actual tendencies, open licenses -like ColorUIRIS and Creative Commons- can’t compete against DRM and big corporations. We have to change this if we really want to ensure an equal rights education. In my opinion this is one of our really big deals.
Some of this things are not very clear yet.

Congratulations for this nice work, John.

By: » Tabla de evolución del conocimiento, de la educación, en la web

» Tabla de evolución del conocimiento, de la educación, en la web — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:37:18 +0000

[...] me parecieron los que John Moravec reflejaba en el gráfico que he traducido y ampliado, como extensión de la transparencia que [...]

By: alafafzan

alafafzan — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:32:01 +0000

Back to the principle of learning, all the information or knowledge we get must be clearly get from what resources and from whom. We actually need to have a better structure of information validation. For example internet marketing (IM), the best way to promote our product is to build the trust between us and the potential customer. So what we give? all the information to convince them to buy our product. Some IM shows their picture, background and with twitter for example, the follower can keep track any updating from the IM. Maybe the factor that the follower to do so mainly because money making tips. But this actually can be apply to all kind of education practices. The key is but 1) Build a systematic structure like twitter for education. Put a ranking or give star indicator for the higher vote and realiable sources like what used by Ebay to the seller and buyer. 3) Suppport with video, real time tutorial (webinar) and soon that where the teacher can really be known and the knowledge is not from the unknown resources.

By: John Moravec

John Moravec — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:18:28 +0000

Great comment, Ryan! I really wanted to highlight that the migration to Society 3.0 requires all of us to become learners and co-teachers. You prompt me to raise a question regarding “learning managers” — how do we manage learning, when we aren’t exactly sure anymore what it is we are supposed to learn?

By: RjWassink

RjWassink — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:15:15 +0000

A very good, well-thought matrix about the next generation of learning. The only thing that I get a little scared about is the “licensed professionals” part disappearing – but then again, there will be a huge need for “learning managers” and other newly-created positions to support Education 3.0.

Of course right now every school and district that you look at is defining and implementing “classroom 2.0″ differently (if at all) – so this is a good generalization, although not necessarily site-accurate.

By: Moving to Educat10n 3.0 « APAD web

Moving to Educat10n 3.0 « APAD web — Mon, 25 May 2009 18:44:18 +0000

[...] 2.0. Tags: elearnmanifesto trackback I need to repost this table from John Moravec’s educationfutures (on which I landed thanks to El Caparazón. Its implications for discussion on education are [...]

By: alafafzan

alafafzan — Sat, 16 May 2009 07:02:49 +0000

Education 2.0 is really interesting issues. When I first thinking of dynamical of learning methods, I think education upgrading to 2.0 and soon. But then come accross my mind. How the reliable and souces issues will be handled. For me education is something come with integrity and trustfullness. For example; if you teach or give information that AiDS can be cured. but let say it is fake. The drug description or any others remedies given may become a poison checimal and soon. That’s why education is not only providing information but the realible and integrity of the information must be secured and spreaded among communities of education 2.0. I think the idea of Education 3.0 must be put with this elements. Unless no one will responsible with the chaos or havoc come from wrong information given.