<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using tech to teach the same old garbage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.educationfutures.com/2007/05/05/using-tech-to-teach-the-same-old-garbage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.educationfutures.com/2007/05/05/using-tech-to-teach-the-same-old-garbage/</link>
	<description>Exploring a New Paradigm in human capital development, driven by accelerating change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:46:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michele Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.educationfutures.com/2007/05/05/using-tech-to-teach-the-same-old-garbage/comment-page-1/#comment-6221</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 16:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.educationfutures.com/2007/05/05/using-tech-to-teach-the-same-old-garbage/#comment-6221</guid>
		<description>What really depressed me about the NYT article was the fact that it seemed to be supporting the idea that laptops shouldn&#039;t be used in schools. Rather than really focusing on the fact that schools are refusing to change how they do business and THAT&#039;S why laptops aren&#039;t working, the article seemed to be saying that the schools are right to dump their technology programs. This only makes the problem worse. Sad, sad, sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really depressed me about the NYT article was the fact that it seemed to be supporting the idea that laptops shouldn&#8217;t be used in schools. Rather than really focusing on the fact that schools are refusing to change how they do business and THAT&#8217;S why laptops aren&#8217;t working, the article seemed to be saying that the schools are right to dump their technology programs. This only makes the problem worse. Sad, sad, sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.educationfutures.com/2007/05/05/using-tech-to-teach-the-same-old-garbage/comment-page-1/#comment-24224</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 15:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.educationfutures.com/2007/05/05/using-tech-to-teach-the-same-old-garbage/#comment-24224</guid>
		<description>What really depressed me about the NYT article was the fact that it seemed to be supporting the idea that laptops shouldn&#039;t be used in schools. Rather than really focusing on the fact that schools are refusing to change how they do business and THAT&#039;S why laptops aren&#039;t working, the article seemed to be saying that the schools are right to dump their technology programs. This only makes the problem worse. Sad, sad, sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really depressed me about the NYT article was the fact that it seemed to be supporting the idea that laptops shouldn&#8217;t be used in schools. Rather than really focusing on the fact that schools are refusing to change how they do business and THAT&#8217;S why laptops aren&#8217;t working, the article seemed to be saying that the schools are right to dump their technology programs. This only makes the problem worse. Sad, sad, sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
