Building a Leapfrog University v5.0

Written by John Moravec on Thursday, October 12, 2006 at 13:13

If you’re new here and like what you read, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed.
Thank you for visiting!

Arthur Harkins and I yesterday released “version 5.0” of our Building a “Leapfrog” University series. The document provides recommendations gathered from the University of Minnesota community on steps the University may take to transform into one of the top universities in the world. The recommendations generated by this activity run parallel to and complement the University’s own strategic repositioning process.

Future development of this memo series and its leapfrog concepts will now be conducted entirely online at the University’s community Wiki in “open source” tradition: https://wiki.umn.edu/twiki/bin/view/Leapfrog/WebHome

We invite your comments, corrections and additions to what we have written as well as direct input to the Leapfrog Wiki. We especially request your thoughts on the application of innovative and dynamic design principles to the University’s future

For your reference, previous release versions are available online at http://www.educationfutures.com/leapfrog

Contact:

  • Arthur Harkins, University of MN, harki001@umn.edu, 612/743-7528
  • John Moravec, University of MN, moravec@umn.edu, 612/325-5992

The Memo: Building a “Leapfrog” University v5.0

Date: October 11, 2006

To: All Participants and University of Minnesota Community

From: Arthur Harkins and John Moravec

Subject: Building a “Leapfrog” University: Employing the Liberal Skills and Supporting Technologies for Undergraduate Education

“We are all search engines” is a slogan associated with the University’s “Driven to Discover” campaign. It is a metaphor –or possibly a simile– that models the human mind on silicon processors. Humans are not search engines. Humans are inherently more creative and capable than procedural automatons. A more uplifting approach is to stress the creativity and innovativeness of the human mind, and to embed these within thoroughly restructured services to University of Minnesota undergraduates. Later in this memorandum, a virtual leader will speak of such matters to the 2009 freshman class.

Launching a Leapfrog University

This is our “version 5.0” memorandum on the future of the University of Minnesota. Because our approach has been one of “open source development” from the beginning, the memo series will henceforth be developed and distributed through a wiki platform (a Web documentation authoring tool to which anyone may contribute) available at: https://wiki.umn.edu/twiki/bin/view/Leapfrog/WebHome

We continue to promote the University of Minnesota as a Leapfrog University exemplar. A Leapfrog University works ahead of the competition in teaching, research, innovation, and service. It avoids playing catch-up. A hesitant, symbolic step in the movement toward a Leapfrog University was the recently promoted “Driven to Discover” slogan.

Discovery is about the acquisition of information and knowledge. Others have identified discovery as a “Mode I” knowledge production activity, based on science and scholarship –often creating knowledge for the sake of creating new knowledge. “Mode II” knowledge production follows Mode I; it refers to purposeful, applied knowledge. As a Land Grant, the University of Minnesota has been heavily involved in Modes I and II knowledge production. Hence, the logic underlying “Driven to Discover.”

We do not think the singular promotion of discovery will be sufficient if the University is to become one of the top three public institutions worldwide. This “version 5.0” of our original memo focuses on the reframing of undergraduate education at the University. Among other approaches, we stress four additional Modes of knowledge production.

Recently, the University’s Center for Teaching and Learning/Academy of Distinguished Teachers released their first newsletter. The document’s contents centered around the question, “what do we want our students to learn?” Arlene Carney’s article in the newsletter lists the directions that she and the Council for Enhancing Student Learning (CESL) believe that the University should move toward:

  1. The ability to identify, define, and solve problems.
  2. The ability to locate and evaluate information.
  3. Mastery of a body of knowledge and mode of inquiry.
  4. An understanding of diverse philosophies and cultures in a global society.
  5. The ability to communicate effectively.
  6. An understanding of the role(s) of creativity, innovation, discovery, and expression in the arts and humanities and in the natural and social sciences.
  7. Skills for effective citizenship and life-long learning.

We feel that these objectives are admirable “download” (or “banking”) approaches for a reasonable learning experience at the high school level. We do not think that such download learning services are going to enhance the status of the University’s lackluster undergraduate productivity, let alone vault it into world leadership and standing. In fact, the goals advanced by CESL are a progressive, yet stale, list of ideas that have been around for many decades. The list promotes images of the student as a passive, obedient, uncreative dependent.

We argue that undergraduate education should concentrate on “upload” pedagogies, based on knowledge production by students and collaborating faculty, together with augmentations provided by a new category of off-campus volunteers. Using the most advanced forms of information search engines, networks, early artificial intelligence, and the aforementioned volunteers, there is an opportunity to leapfrog the University’s undergraduate education beyond any of the competition. This will require fundamental changes in the mission, structure, and curricula of undergraduate education.

As we have noted before, pervasive creativity, knowledge production, invention, innovation, and support by advanced technologies must underpin serious efforts to achieve global standing as one of the world’s top three public research universities. We assert that undergraduates must be involved in the production of new knowledge. We believe, therefore, that to achieve global standing in its undergraduate services, the University must balance the liberal arts with what we call the liberal skills. We do not believe that this balance will be effective without expecting and providing for creative behaviors on the parts of students, faculty, and their supportive volunteers.

The liberal skills defined: The liberal skills are the applied derivations of the liberal arts and related areas that may be applied in transdisciplinary contexts in new knowledge production and innovation. Such skills support students to succeed today and into the future. The core liberal skills encompass virtual time manipulation through simulational thinking, knowledge production, technology, communication, critical and multi-paradigmatic thinking, focused imagination, developed intuition, emotional intelligence, and systems design.

In this 5.0 memo, we associate the liberal skills with four additional Modes of knowledge production. We continue by identifying core components of the liberal skills through a virtual speech in the next section. Additional links are provided to permit selective attention to these components. We further continue to invite involvement and contributions from the University community.

What We Must Do, and How it Can be Done: An Achievable Scenario

The following services are some of the basics of the liberal skills that apply to a Leapfrog University, rather than to a University playing “catch-up.” These services are not definitive, but serve as a starting point for open source development of the liberal skills in a world class Leapfrog University. Their focus is on undergraduate students and the futures they will create, individually and socially. This scenario describes the Leapfrog University’s grouping of services as they may be introduced to the freshman class of 2009, who in 2006 were sophomores in their high schools. Speaking to this class at convocation, the President of the University of Minnesota declares:

Our Leapfrog University is poised to lead as one of the very top research universities in the world. Our University will create vibrant, visionary, hard-charging, front-running and value-creating impacts that everybody will be proud to variously support, work for, teach at, matriculate to, collaborate with, and donate toward. We shall lead this charge together.

Supportive Technologies in the Leapfrog University

The following list is merely a handful of a multitude of technologies the Leapfrog University may employ to enhance learning and facilitate meaningful knowledge production for all members of its community:

Background to this Memo Series

Over the past year, the University of Minnesota has engaged in an ambitious strategic repositioning process to become one of the top three public research institutions in the world. We believe the University and Minnesota can do better. Since January, 2006, we have engaged in a parallel, open source-modeled re-visioning process to produce actionable recommendations to propel the University to the position of the world’s top knowledge-producing institution.

To date, we have received many responses, formal and informal, to the first four release versions of this document. Respondents include University leadership, faculty and students, a state leader, students and faculty from other public research universities, and leaders of Minnesota companies. This updated “Version 5.0” release incorporates their comments and insights toward supporting the University’s strategic vision.

Our “Noble Quest” (as suggested by Robert Giampietro, retired VP, Target Corp.)

A new paradigm founded on the convergence of globalization, the rise of knowledge societies, and accelerating change is emerging. This calls for an entirely new mission for all levels of education with a new mindset and vocabulary for action. The Leapfrog Paradigm emerges when societies, organizations and individuals employ innovative means to surge ahead of the competition. Consider the Leapfrog Paradigm in Minnesota, and:

Imagine a second “Minnesota Miracle”…

Imagine the University of Minnesota…

Imagine Minnesota students…

Embracing the Leapfrog Paradigm as a Pathway to Success

We can achieve a second Minnesota Miracle within a decade. The pathway is through the innovative organizational practices and mindset of leapfrogging. We contend the first nation or state to adopt the Leapfrog Paradigm, bolster it with advanced communications technologies, and apply it in Pre-K through graduate contexts, will either continue to lead or will acquire newfound leadership among emerging knowledge and innovation economies.

In this memorandum, our focus is placed on the undergraduate education required to produce knowledge and direct it toward continuous innovation. We call for an entirely new undergraduate education mission –one that requires a different vocabulary and mindset compared to the now globally-distributed education missions for agricultural, industrial, and information-based societies. We believe that reforming undergraduate education to lead the competition in knowledge production and innovation is accomplishable; that it is appropriate, harmonizes with workforce needs, and better prepares students for post-graduate work.

Under the circumstances it will not do to simply call for interdisciplinarity, which mostly turns out to be cross-disciplinarity. Achieving the Leapfrog Paradigm will require transdisciplinarity (the dynamic creation of new disciplines) and postdisciplinarity (the creation of routinely productive uniqueness at the level of the individual).

Further Reading

Please start at the Leapfrog Wiki “Key Ideas” page to explore key concepts that drive the Leapfrog University.

Coda

The initiators of this wiki and memorandum series invite comments, corrections and additions to what we have written as well as direct input to the Leapfrog Wiki. We especially request your thoughts on the application of innovative and dynamic design principles to the University’s future.

Related posts

Category: Accelerating Change, Articles, Globalization, Public Policy

Tags: , , , , , ,

No comments

There are no comments, yet.

Write a comment

XHTML: You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



 
educationfutures.com Web

About Education Futures


Exploring a New Paradigm in human capital development, fueled by globalization, the rise of innovative knowledge societies, and driven by exponential, accelerating change.